Thought are welcome, patches are appreciated. Test cases are ... really nice :-) If there's one thing I've found, persistence (polite persistence) is a very good thing to have as well ;-)

John Yu wrote:

At 08:31 pm 01-03-03, you wrote:

First, David was probably trying to be helpful. (Why reinvent the wheel?)

No dispute about that! David's and other committers' dedication of time and energy is much appreciated.


But to answer your question, I think the litmus test would be whether there is a working patch annexed.

[snipped]

Meanwhile, if we have a good suite of tests, and a patch comes along, it will be easier for any of us to commit it (since the tests will help catch any problems).

Summing up, is it fair to say that "an enhancement request which comes with a patch (and possibly some test cases) will be given relatively higher priority, regardless whether its functionality overlaps with other technologies"? (And "persistence counts as well.")


Shall this be added somewhere on the webpage?


--
Eddie Bush





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to