Ok, I have a saved query that shows open bugs so they were showing up in my list. When I checked their comments it seemed logical to mark as later. We should probably decide on system for how to deal with bugs so we don't step on each other.

I'm fine with whatever we decide as long as I can save another bugzilla query to show just open bugs, and another for just enhancements.

David


I've been tagging the "resolved laters" for the "unknown" build and then indicating a milestone.

This gets them off the list of things we need to handle for the current iteration, but does not force us to go through the red tape of "reopening it" later.

-T.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18094>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.


http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18094

validate method on ValidatorForm should use mapping.getName as key to validator

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |LATER



--
Ted Husted,
Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to