Here's a query for all open bugs (not enhancements) for the commons components we're dependant on:
http://tinyurl.com/8u6g


If someone is working on a fix, the bug will be assigned to them or they will have made a comment in the report. If someone is assigned a bug but it's been open for a long time with no activity you can email them and ask about their status.

David



From: "Brandon Goodin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OT}So I did a bug query and...
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:18:51 -0700


I queryed the bug database and I see 10 or fewer bugs for commons dbcp and pool. I assume these are the bugs that need to be fixed. But, I have a few questions.

1) When I queried the bug database there were several parameters that I
wasn't sure about... How do I know I am querying the database for the full
list current bugs etc...? Following is my query for dbcp. Is this producing
an honest listing of needed fixes?

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSI
GNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&em
ail2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&change
din=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Commons&compone
nt=Dbcp&short_desc=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type
=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&key
words_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&
order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time

2) How do I know which bugs are higher priority. I know that people who
submit them often set the priorities different than the committers would.
So, are the but reports edited to reflect their true priority.

3) How do I know if someone has started working on a patch/fix for a bug
already?

Brandon Goodin

-----Original Message-----
From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction


:-D Oh, okay... so we aren't going to get ahead of ourselves? Shucks! I thought the goal was to get everything done "good enough" and then move on ;-). Thanks for the tip. I will check out the needs in commons.

Brandon Goodin

-----Original Message-----
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ValidatorLookupDispatchAction or VLDAction


>P.S. When will the 2.0 discussions start? I would love to be involved in >them...

If you're anxious to talk about 2.0 why not volunteer some time in the
commons projects we're dependant on so we can finish 1.1?  DBCP and Pool
still need some work.

David


_________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to