--- Etienne_Labonté <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I remember you saying you would release 1.2 ASAP after removing
> all
> the deprecated stuff. I would like that very much since I have to
> comment
> out a few deprecated things in 1.1 and build my own Struts.jar

No, 1.2 will include a move to commons-resources and other minor
enhancements as well as removing the deprecated stuff.

David

> 
> Etienne
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:13 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release
> 
> > Moving forward, if someone were to start to add another enhancement
> (or
> > "product change") while another was already unreleased in the nightly 
> > build, I would veto the change and force a point release. (And if I 
> > didn't I'm sure someone else around here now would.) The justification
> 
> > being that we simply don't have the resources to support releasing so 
> > many changes at once.
> 
> Just for clarification, each enhancement doesn't need it's own release,
> just major changes like moving to commons-resources.  I see each point
> release as having at most one major change and I will join Ted in
> vetoing
> any major changes occuring while another is in progress.
> 
> I've personally signed up for about 10 minor enhancements to 1.2 and
> will
> help with the commons-resources move.  When that move is done we should
> cut 1.2.
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > The other issue was moving dependencies to other products. We should
> now
> > 
> > make a point release before (or after) moving or adding any 
> > dependencies, even if it is to a Commons product. The next thing on my
> 
> > radar is moving some dependencies to Commons Resources. So as soon as
> we
> > 
> > do that and the code seems stable, it should trigger a point-release.
> > 
> > Since we are all volunteers here, what gets done depends on who is
> > willing to actually do something. There is no hierarchy; individual
> > committers decide what they want to work on, and then other developers
> > chip in as they wish. But, we can each veto any product change we
> > believe is technically unsound, which provides a check and balance.
> > 
> > Most of us are working stiffs, so we tend to do things that we need
> for 
> > our own applications. The vast majority of changes to Struts come
> about 
> > from developers submitting patches they made so that their own 
> > applications became easier to write.
> > 
> > -Ted.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ted Husted,
> > Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to