--- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > > > > > Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 22:21:16 -0700 > > > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Nightly build is generating empty binary distribution file > > > > > > I've noticed that the nightly build is not generating the binary > > > distribution. There is an archive created but it's only 45 bytes. > > > <http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/> > > > > > > As the gump build is working it looks like a configuration problem > is > > > preventing the files being copied/archived. Could this be to due to > the > > > build version number change from 1.1 to 1.2? > > > > > > I couldn't find any documentation on configuring the nightly build > process > > > so I can't confirm or fix the problem. Can someone please take a > look > and/or > > > point me in the direction of some info on the nightly build config? > > > > > > > It's running on my personal desktop (which recently went through a > hard > > disk failure and replacement). Unfortunately, I've only got JDK 1.4.2 > > installed right now, and compiling struts-legacy requires 1.3 or > before to > > compile :-(. > > Given that we have struts-legacy on its own release cycle, I think we > need > to decouple the struts-legacy build from the main Struts build. They > were > coupled shortly before the 1.1 final release, and that was a big pain > when I > was creating the release. I should be able to do 'ant clean dist' at the > top > level and point to an existing struts-legacy release, but I can't do > that > the way the builds are coupled right now. > > I could have just gone in and undone the coupling that was done (and I > still > could ;), but I'd like to understand why they are so tightly coupled > before > I do that. It seems not only unnecessary, but also highly undesirable, > especially when struts-legacy is independently released.
Not only that, but struts-legacy was only provided for backwards compatibility with 1.0.2. Now that 1.1 is out we should remove struts-legacy and get out of the DataSource implementation business altogether. I believe that was the original plan anyways. David > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
