DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22314>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22314 Performance Enhancement [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-11 18:32 ------- Briefly scanning over this enhancement I am not sure how this would work since there are seperate threads created/pooled for each request and generally Struts doesn't work with users that is the Business logic side or even the containers job. I do like to be proved wrong. So if you have implemented these changes and tested them then we/I would welcome your input if there is some change we can make in struts to make implementing your 'add-on' to struts easier. I don't see the changes going into Struts though. Again if you have implemented this then the best route if to send an email to the struts developer list with a subject like "[PROPOSAL] ThrottleRequest processor". That way you may get feedback on this idea, refine it the reopen the request. I'm marking this as INVALID for now but feel free to disagree and reopen it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
