>> (although for 1.1 we'd probably implement all this inside a new one >> that simply replaces the process() method with the appropriate chain >> lookup and execution.)
For clarity, we probably should be saying the 1.x processor, since we'd certainly be past 1.1.x before anything like this shipped. (Old habits die hard.)
-Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
