On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:31:22 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Short terms plans > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > Sorry for the late response on this ... it seems like weekends are the > > only time I get to play with open source code any more :-(. > > I hear that, brother! =:0) The catch-as-catch-can thing isn't working > for me anymore either, so I think I'll take my own advice > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/faqs/helping.html#corp > > and block out a regular time for open source development and call it > part of the work week. I really want to Bugzilla sorted-out and fill in > some of the remaining gaps in the documentation. > > Since we have a wiki now, I thought it might be helpful to setup a short > term plans page. I took the liberty (surprise!) of adding some notes > people have made on the list or in Bugzilla recently. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?action=edit&id=StrutsShortTermPlans >
I just added "final cleanups to commons-resources" to my list. > Also, I setup a Job Jar page on the Wiki > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?StrutsJobJar > > I'd like to add this item as well: > > * <b>A maintainer for the conventional Struts taglibs package is > needed.</b> If you are motivated, self-starting developer who is > actively using these tags, groks the Apache Way, and can spare the time, > please take a look at the outstanding reports for the taglibs > components, and start submitting patches for our consideration. > +1. Lots of people rely on these tags, and will for a long time. > But thought I should see if we have consensus on this first. > > At one time, we were not pursuing the conventional tags because we did > not want to steer people away from JSTL. But now that we have an > actively-supported JSTL tag library, it may be time to fish around for > someone to actively maintain this package on behalf of the segment of > our Community who need, or choose, to use these tags. > > Usually, I would suggest we let nature take its course and see if a > taglib developer appears spontaneously. But, I think we may have given > the community the impression that we are antagonistic towards these > tags, and it may be prudent to take affirmative action to correct that > impression. > > -Ted. > Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
