+1 here too

Also note that in deprecating ActionErrors (whomever did
that, it's lost in the bowels of my e-mail archive), it
broke all the default validators because they had
ActionErrors in their method signatures.  I released a fix
for it today.

James 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on
Validator 1.1.0
> 
> +1
> 
> > Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts.
In 
> fact it may 
> > be  100%.
> > I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator
to 
> Beta status 
> > is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the
1.1.0 version 
> > which has  released in August and been designated an
Alpha. 
> I propose 
> > that this Sunday Sept 28 th that  we switch over to the 
> 1.1.0 version 
> > of Validator, then quickly release Version 1.1.1 which
has had 
> > additional numerious improvements in it's Javascript
validation.
> >
> > Othewise I honestly see how Validator 1.1.0 is ever
going to get 
> > enough usage to ever be promoted to beta status.
> >
> > Reactions.
> >
> >
> > 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
--------- 
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to