--- stu robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, thanks for the quick followup last week on the > readyness of builds including ValidWhen. I started > testing our application against this build this > morning. > > The one would-be showstopper for us (although we work > around it) is that the current snapshot of > commons-collections has a number of serialization > bugs. We're using decorators fairly extensively for > type-safety. Since they're not serializable, they > cause NotSerializableException when returned from > stateless session EJBs. We're currently using a > collections 3.0 build that we've modified to make > these serializable. But the Struts 1.2 nightly comes > with the broken version.
Why are we distributing nightly builds of commons components that we rely on? IMO, unless we need the very latest features of commons package X we should ship nightly Struts builds with the last released version of X. David > > This bugzilla search shows the bugs we're working > around: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&product=Commons&component=Collections&short_desc=serializable&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=&cmdtype=doit&order=%27Importance%27 > > The other thing I've noticed is that the validator > includes a number of DTDs that don't seem to match the > files they ship with. validator-rules.xml references > the DTD > "http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dtds/validator_1_1.dtd";, > and the distribution ships with 2 local DTDs for the > validator, "validator-rules_1_1.dtd" and > "validation_1_1.dtd". Neither of these match the > reference in the rules.xml file. Developing behind > our firewall, local DTDs are many developers' only > option for validation. If I modify the rules.xml file > to reference either of these DTDs, errors appear. Are > these old DTDs, or am I missing something? > > Stu Robertson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
