Quoting Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > For all three of the cases, though, we > > probably want to invent a different term than "form bean" because that > seems so > > conceptually tied to presentation only. Transaction Bean? Input Bean? > Data > > Transfer Object :-)? > > InputHandler? >
That would certainly be an appropriate name for my type (3) form bean (that included event handling), and perhaps even for a type (2) form bean that includes some sort of hooks into validation. It doesn't fit the type (1) style that contains only data, though. > -T. > > Craig > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
