From what I read on the instructions for the license file stuff I also need to update the xml that is transformed into our documentation and add a comment to that as well. I'll submit another patch for the contrib. Given how many pieces I had to break the main src patch into, it might be less confusing for me to open seperate bugzilla entries for the docs and contrib. Anyone have any thoughts on that? Do you think we need to go as far as properties files? Then there's stuff like stuts-config.... I guess it should have the header too. It's not as onerous with the new license at least.
I should probably still remove <author> tags from the docs and consolidate those into the volunteers page also. I volunteer to take care of that. Several weeks ago I thought we were closer than we were to the 1.2 release and thought it might be a good idea to wait until after the release to make sweeping changes like those that touched a lot of files. The only @author tags in java source are in contrib and org.apache.struts.webapp.upload.UploadAction is the only class in the core distrubution with an author tag. It was added after I swept the main source. I am generally pretty detailed. :) So I'm raring to go on those. Let me know when I can start working on patches for these items.
Paul Sundling
After 1.2.0 is out of the gate, we can apply Paul's license patches, as you suggest. Per Greg's board summary, we'll want to make sure we have the license on all applicable files. Also, since the board is now officially discouraging the use of @author tags, I'd like to see us remove those too.
--
Martin Cooper
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
