You have forgoten
www.jboss.org an open source ejb container, it is release with tomcat.
Eric Brown a écrit :
> I haven't done any comparisons recently, but I think Resin from
> www.caucho.com is very reasonably priced and written specifically with
> performance in mind (from what I can tell). I've written a Java based http
> proxy server before and I can tell you that from looking at some of the
> things Resin has done, they know where Java's performance bottlenecks are.
> (For example, they translate all socket streams into byte arrays instead of
> using strings, etc.) They have some performance comparisons on their web
> site.
>
> Others are:
> Orion - Know nothing about
> BEA WebLogic - Very expensive, complex to deploy and performance is mediocre
> according to my sources
> ATG Dynamo - Expensive but good for commerce if needed. They are focused on
> commerce, so probably not focused on performance.
> Netscape/iPlanet - I've heard the performance is not impressive
> IBM WebSphere - This is an up-and-coming competitor to WebLogic and ATG. It
> used to be buggy and is still expensive. Performance is unknown, but I would
> favor Resin as it comes with source and is less expensive.
> Jrun - Priced reasonably. Nice integration with other Allaire products. No
> special commerce features. I think it has had some compatibility problems,
> but it seems a good engine these days. All the same, I don't think you can
> get source and I haven't done performance tests.
> Enhydra - This is just Tomcat. They have their own framework that is less
> comprehensive than struts called XMLC. Its big advantage is that it does a
> better job of separating UI from code.
>
> I think to some degree, it is equally important to look at the JVM you are
> running on. Consider looking at the Volano report at
> http://www.volano.com/report.html.
>
> My team is using Tomcat/Forte for development and will use Resin/Apache for
> deployment.
>
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Performance of struts
>
> If Tomcat's performance is pretty awful, what are some JSP implementations
> (commercial or otherwise) that are particularly good?
>
> At 12:10 PM 3/19/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Struts based apps (or any app that uses custom tags heavily) are going to
> >be significantly impacted by the quality of the JSP implementation in your
> >container. Which version are you using? (NOTE: Tomcat's performance
> >w.r.t. JSP pages is pretty awful, for example).
> >
> > > Thanks!
> > > keith
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >Craig McClanahan
>
> James W. Howe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Allen Creek Software, Inc. pgpkey:
> http://ic.net/~jwh/pgpkey.html
> Ann Arbor, MI 48103
