I would prefer to have the source available. I like
the ease doing an installation without having to run a
build, and the ability to look at the source if
anything goes wrong.
I'd suggest jaring up the source in a src.jar, like
the JDK.
Calvin
--- Wong Kok Wai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just the binary with docs and examples (with
> sources).
> Thanks!
>
> --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > As we move towards a 1.0 release of Struts
> (really!
> > :-), one of the
> > things I am cleaning up is the way that binary
> > distributions are
> > packaged. Currently, we follow the typical
> Jakarta
> > pattern of including
> > the source code for Struts in the binary
> > distribution (in the "etc",
> > "src", and "web" directories), as well as in a
> > separate download.
> >
> > My question is, do people find the fact that the
> > binary distribution
> > includes source code useful, or would it be OK to
> > just point you at the
> > download URL for the source distribution if you
> want
> > it? For recent
> > builds, this would cut the size of the binary
> > distribution by about one
> > third.
> >
> > I'm fine with doing it either way, but wanted to
> get
> > some feedback from
> > the community before making a final decision.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
