Subject: Re: Struts/FOP From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === INLINE Sandeep Takhar wrote:
> when you emit RTF, can the users edit this format > (unlike PDF). YES, USER COULD EDIT IT I SUPPOSE. > > is there an import into word and does it lose the > formatting? FORMATTING IS PERFECT, SINCE YOU GENERATED IT MANUALLY. WORD IS NOT REQUIRED. ANY OS HAS A RTF (GOV. SPEC) READER. > sorry for my ignorance. ONLY PEOPLE WHO KNOW, HOW MUCH IS THERE TO KNOW, ARE HUMBLE. I THINK MYSELF IGNORANT. USE ANY INFO AT YOUR OWN PERIL. > Sandeep > --- Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Cocoon and Struts are different. >>Since I wanted to avoid server side production load >>issues (of lots of >>XSLT) I emit XML from JSP to browses. >> >>And the browses then do the XSLT FOP-like for me. >>This way salability is >>flat, as more users use it, each user uses its own >>XSLT on client side. >>(For older browser, need JavaScript for XSLT, but >>new ones do XML just fine) >> >>(And I also use RTF instead of PDF, since RTF reader >>is already >>installed on all OSes, and Adobe PDF has to be >>installed and for other >>reasons I avoid Adobe . And I do not use all the FOP >>tags, just a few >>like table and row). >> >>Vic >> >>(promo: my book at basebeans.com talks about XSL in >>a chapter) >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>I would be interested in your approach. I used >>> >>Cocoon to publish to a PDF >> >>>file. Anyone with integration issues between the >>> >>two frameworks? >> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Safa. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm interested in this as well. I just finished >>>> >>a project writing a >> >>>XSL/FO stylesheet to generate a report, and did >>> >>the creation through >> >>>command line via a junit test suite. >>> >>> >>>>If you get this figured out, let me know, I'd be >>>> >>happy to help publish a >> >>>struts-fop example! >>> >>> >>>>Matt >>>> "John M. Corro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>wrote: Has anyone ever >> >>>generated a PDF file (via FOP) from an Action >>> >>servlet? Any >> >>>>implications in doing so via an Action servlet vs. >>>> >>a standard/plain >> >>>servlet? >>> >>> >>>>I've reviewed the servlet example from the FOP >>>> >>distro. and it seems as >> >>>if as >>> >>> >>>>long as I have access to the response object >>>> >>(which I do in the Action >> >>>>servlet) I should be fine. >>>> >>>>For those interested, the situation is that (from >>>> >>a servlet) I will be >> >>>using >>> >>> >>>>Enhydra's Zeus to generate an in-memory XML doc, >>>> >>then using that XML doc >> >>>and >>> >>> >>>>a pre-written XSL stylesheet I plan on using FOP >>>> >>to build a PDF doc and >> >>>>shoot it back to the user's browser. Not too out >>>> >>of the ordinary, but I'd >> >>>>like to inquire into any pitfalls. >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>--------------------------------- >>>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>>Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctionsfor >>>> >>all of your holiday >> >>>gifts! >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>> >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of > your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com > or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
