I believe you :-) But even in that case, the tag should not throw an NPE. IMO, it would be better then to adapt the tld to make "property" required.
tomK, loving the Belgian beer ;) > -----Original Message----- > From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: woensdag 23 januari 2002 23:43 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: property 'property' not set in NestedSubmitTag > > > Believe it or not, this is as expected... > > The nested extension is not to simply maintain the > functionality of the > original, but to provide it in the nested context. If you > don't want the > features of the nested context (the default submit tag), then use the > original html:submit > > When you use a nested tag, one thing is expected. The "property" > property to be set and intended to be used in the nested context. > Also, where tags use a "name" attribute to identify a bean, > this will be > done automatically, supplied or not. > > Just keep in mind, that if you don't need to nest a property, > you should > look at using the original tags in its place. > That's why all the tags weren't extended. Only those who > could benefit > from it. > > > Arron. > > > Christian Simonutti wrote: > > >On Wed Jan 23, 2002 at 03:2322PM +0100, Tom Klaasen > (TeleRelay) wrote: > > > >>Does attached patch work for you? > >> > > > >yes, works with reduced tag (<html:submit />) as expected. > > > >thanx, > >simon > > > >[snip] > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-user-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
