Thanks for the info.
Out of curiosity, what version of Poolman and Oracle thin client are you using? We have a policy here that frowns upon using anything marked as beta on our production systems, and I'm wondering about the stability of the beta Poolman 2.1. Should I be using the older 2.0.4 version instead? -Mark Jason B Menard wrote: > We are using Poolman with the Oracle thin client. It does not replace it, > just sits on top of it. > > One of the benefits is that you can specify your various pools in an XML > file. This makes any changes that might need to be made at a later date > simple, and also ensures consistancy across the organization. Specifying > all your connection pools in one place, even if there are different > databases, is a nice benefit. It also makes it easier on the developers. > Poolman does not do just connection pooling though, it will pool any object. > > We've been using it for a few versions now and have been pretty happy with > it so far. It's painless to setup and get running, so you might want to > take a look at it and see if it's right for you. > > Jason
