No. But you can read from the archives without being a member of the list.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:09 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Traffic is it possible to be a member of the list an NOT get any email sent to me? i'd rather just read from archives.. -----Original Message----- From: Struts Newsgroup [mailto:@[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Traffic Subject: Re: Traffic From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === This list is cloned at news.basebeans.com so you can see and post everything and not have to delete. Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I really do agree that users of the mailing list should be *strongly* encouraged > to search the archives (maybe just with STA, though, so they don't get too > offended!). Sooooo many questions come up that have been tackled over and over > again. I was off for a week last week and had almost 900 messages in my inbox > to delete, which is crazy. > > Dave > > > > > > "Galbreath, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/12/2002 > 07:27:17 AM > > Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: (bcc: David Hay/Lex/Lexmark) > Subject: RE: Traffic > > > > It's going to get worse. Nevertheless, you will never be able to manage the > number/technical level of users in an open forum. SERVLET-INTEREST became > too congested with basic setup and config questions by people too lazy to > search the archive for an answer (and how many scores of questions have been > asked here regarding ActionForm in just the past 2 weeks?) so a few guys > created ADVANCED-SERVLET-INTEREST and began regulating the level of users. > > One thing that helped, however, was being brutally blunt with obviously lame > users and telling them to STFA (search the f*cking archives), STFW (...web) > and RTFM. This started a couple of flame wars, and the Sun moderator > finally had to banish a few people, but the quality and quantity of posts > changed considerably for the better. > > I'm not suggesting that's an answer, but my delete key has been getting a > lot of attention lately.... > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:36 PM > > > Well, it's not dibilitating. I can hack it. I guess I'm neutral on this > one. > > - Cody > > "Barr, Scott [IBM GSA]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/11/2002 > 08:01:41 PM > > I disagree. Most messages are relatively small, and so long as people dont > send attachments there generally isn't too much of a problem. > The delete key is a great filter :) > > Scott > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:28 PM >> >>I second that motion. We do not have filtering capability here at my work >>so I have to manually delete messages! >> >>- Cody >> >>Mark Rines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/11/2002 07:19:43 PM >> >>Phew, >>I vote that we split up this mail list into several topics such as >>installation, configuration, add-ons (such as strutsTests) and extending >>the >>various ActionXXX classes. I am really having trouble keeping up with all >>(over 110 just today) the email. >>Mark >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
