And you didn't define the proper tools, i.e., EMACS and VI. Mark
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: off topic: software development quality/standards Pretty good paper. I think that the last 3 levels: maintainability, usability, and performance (especially the last two) are not strictly hierarchical. In some environments performance takes on a much higher priority and performance may be achieved before usability. But I totally agree that maintainable code will be much easier to performance-tune. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Levin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: off topic: software development quality/standards > > > This is totally off-topic, but I was inpsired by experiences > on a Struts project to write the short essay below. If you're > so inclined, give it a read and maybe tell me what you think. > Don't get me wrong, I am not thinking that it's terribly > original, but hey, it comes from the heart. > > http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~levinv/aphelion/software_development.html > > Vlad > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
