No, haven't looked yet. Problem with logic:iterate creating upwards of 1000
options is that it is VERY slow!
Cheers,
Dave
"JM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/22/2002 02:00:22 PM
Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: David Hay/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: RE: html:options must be enclosed within html:select
Have you looked at the source for OptionTag yet?
The first thing it does is check for a SelectTag in the pageContext.
I believe it is forcing this because it needs to know if it should render it
as "selected".
If you need the functionality of Options, but need to write your own select,
I would suggest using logic:iterate.
Hope that helps.
JM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:53 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: html:options must be enclosed within html:select
>
>
>
>
> Anyone know why this is the case - ie why html:options won't
> accept a regular
> html <select> tag to be enclosed in?
>
> Makes it very frustrating when you don't care about value of
> select when it's
> submitted, but want to use html:options for speed to display a
> collection. You
> have to add a dummy getter in the action form which seems very
> cumbersome at the
> least.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
