http://struts-atlanta.open-tools.org/struts-example-jsp-mod.zip
check back in a few days as I am still modifying the example with other functionality off of my wishlist. James Mitchell Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network" http://struts-atlanta.open-tools.org ICQ: 27651409 AOLIM: jmitchtx (and NO I don’t use AOL;) > -----Original Message----- > From: Umberto Nicoletti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag? > > > Il mer, 2002-06-05 alle 02:17, James Mitchell ha scritto: > > Well, that's the magic in it. > > You never see the url with WEB-INF. > > > > Since we are using a "forward" and not a "redirect", the > control thread can > > go anywhere (its not a request from the browser). > > > > This forces the user to interact with your web app by using *ONLY* the > > actions you've defined. > > They can now no longer call a jsp directly (whether it would > have given an > > error or not) > > > > I'll send it to you personally. > > > > If anyone else would like a copy, just let me know > > Hi James, > I would really appreciate if you could send me that... > Thank you so much! > > Umberto > > > > > James Mitchell > > Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:27 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag? > > > > > > > > > That would be grand. I'm just having problems visualising a > URL to a jsp > > > in WEB-INF. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Adam > > > > > > James Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > >I've modified the struts-example to do this. > > > > > > > >Would you care for a copy of the zip? > > > > > > > >James Mitchell > > > >Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > >>From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >>Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 4:00 PM > > > >>To: Struts Users Mailing List > > > >>Subject: Re: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>What does the forward to a jsp that's in the WEB-INF look like? > > > >> > > > >>Adam > > > >> > > > >>James Mitchell wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>Assuming that the location of the jsp were decided for you, I > > > would think > > > >>>that you wouldn't want anyone hitting a 'struts-ified' jsp > > > regardless of > > > >>>authentication. I think these are separate issues. > > > >>> > > > >>>I know with the QA at my last job, they would try just about > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>anything to get > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>a stack trace in the browser. I think they prided themselves > > > on how many > > > >>>bugs they could log against us. Almost they acted as if > they were paid > > > >>>bonus' for logged defects. > > > >>> > > > >>>Personally, I don't like the idea of adding unnecessary > tags in my jsp, > > > >>>especially if it does functionality that could/should be > in the action > > > >>>class. Ultimately, its up to you, that's what makes > Struts so awesome. > > > >>> > > > >>>James Mitchell > > > >>>Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>-----Original Message----- > > > >>>>From: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >>>>Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 2:43 PM > > > >>>>To: Struts Users Mailing List > > > >>>>Subject: Handling check for logged-inness using a tag? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>If you aren't going to put your JSPs inside the WEB-INF > layer, would > > > >>>>it be a good idea to do the check for a user being logged in by a > > > >>>>simple tag at the top of each JSP? This way at least if > someone tries > > > >>>>to type in a url to a jsp they would be redirected to log in? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>-- > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Rick > > > >>>> > > > >>>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>-- > > > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>-- > > > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >> > > > >> > > > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
