But are DynaActionForm's compatible with JSTL? A discussion on taglibs-user made me think not: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-user&m=102433015725228&w=2
Eddie >On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> Tell me again why I should use the standard form beans? >> >> >> I'm trying to understand because it seems to add complexity having two >> different ways of doing Form Beans. Why not polish up the Dyna bean stuff >> and then dump (er, deprecate) normal Form Beans? >> > >If DynaActionForm had been around from the very beginning, I doubt we >would have ever invented the standard ActionForm bean approach. At the >same time, I can't necessarily justify deprecating something that 100% of >existing 1.0 applications are required to use, especially when the rest of >Struts doesn't care at all which way you do things -- and you can even >make your Actions not care if you use PropertyUtils methods to get and set >the property values. > >> One advantage I will give the normal Form Beans is that they are easier for >> a newbie to pick up and learn. They shorten the learning curve to get >> productive with Struts initially. But if DynaBeans were made to be very >> easy, then this advantage may disappear as well. >> > >It's also a little premature to conclude that DynaActionForm beans are >good replacements for all scenarios where standard ActionForm beans are >currently used - at least in a 1.1 time frame. We need more real world >experience with them to validate this first. > >> >> >> Kevin >> > >Craig __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
