cheers Craig
>From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: dynabeans as value objects in struts 1.0.X >Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:10:35 -0700 (PDT) > > > >On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Adolfo Miguelez wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:33:24 +0000 > > From: Adolfo Miguelez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: dynabeans as value objects in struts 1.0.X > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I quick question with a quick response. I have successfully tested to >create > > value objects as dynabeans in Struts 1.1b1. Custom tags are able to >inspect > > themselves dynabeans (from Commons - BeansUtils package). > > > > However, in production we still have Struts 1.0.2 and we planned >switching > > only to Struts 1.1 when it be released. > > > > On other hand, we intend to implement a generic value object for all our > > apps. From the reasons above, it seems that a dynabean based value >object > > should be fine for Struts 1.0 applications. > > > > The question is: Does struts custom tags are able to inspect properly > > dynabeans in Struts 1.0.2 as they are in Struts 1.1? > > > >No, they don't. The custom tags in 1.0.2 use the older version of >BeanUtils and PropertyUtils that do not know what a DynaBean is. > >You can put commons-beanutils.jar into a 1.0.2 app and use dynabeans for >your back end stuff. It's just the Struts tags that will not recognize >them. > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Adolfo. > > > >Craig > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
