It really *can* work quite well. You must not be subscribed to commons-dev, or you'd know how well it can (and does!) work.
Galbraith, Paul wrote: >I agree, I just can't see tagging like this ever working all that well. > >If there is an easily identifiable (esp. to non-Struts gurus) topic that seems to >generate a fair amount of traffic, then I think a separate mailing list is a better >idea. Tiles is a good example, I think. > >Paul > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Afternoon chaps! > >My problem with starting these "[topic] subject" headers for our emails is that every >time a new person posts to the list you'll be going through the same hell telling >them how to format their headers correctly, (as well as how to search the archive, >how to phrase questions . . . .etc) To me it would be nice if everyone done this, but >chances are it's not going to happen. The few people who try to do it are going to >get annoyed that no one else does etc. Getting people to put half decent headers on >the emails would be a start. How many time have you seen things like "help" or >"struts problem"? Why else are these people posting to the group? These headers might >help with these problems, but I doubt it would ever be enough to filter your emails. > >Totally agree that making 2 list will just encourage double posting too! > >Regards >IV > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
