Yeah, I'm totally for it - I need some time to spend tidying up and documenting what I've done (I did reply to Matt personally), but then I'm happy to feed it to the lions. As I said to Matt, it's just a brain dump and needs a shed load of work. I'm hoping to get some time after Tuesday.
In the meantime, is your toy available for scrutiny? >-----Original Message----- >From: Ralf E. Stranzenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 06 October 2002 08:47 >To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: AW: [OT] Should I use a persistence layer? > > >Hi, > >i would like to underline that. My own (toy) project is also >based on hibernate and i spend much time doing very basic >things, reinventing the wheel. May be there are many of us out >there all doing the same who could at least act as a sparring partner. > >- Ralf > >-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Matt Veitas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2002 22:48 >An: Struts Users Mailing List >Betreff: Re: [OT] Should I use a persistence layer? > > >Is there anyway that you could post some more info about your >thoughts, suggestions, ideas, etc about "Huts". Maybe even >post a link to a zip/tar with the current work you have? I >would be very interested in this and helping out with the >project as I am using a combination of Struts and Hibernate >both at work and home and find them BOTH very useful! > >Matt > > >Cliff Rowley wrote: > >>Hibernate rocks :) I've been using it lots - I'm glad to see other >>people are using it too. I've been working on an extension to the >>Struts framework to support Hibernate (a plugin and >associated vanilla >>CRUD actions) - but my time has been limited recently (I have >another 2 >>personal projects, one being a Struts Wiki) and all of my efforts are >>being ploughed into my latest contract (which just turned up >trumps, as >>I'm going to be paid more than I thought I was - almost half >the amount >>again in fact). >> >>As soon as I am in a position to continue development on the >framework >>(which is currently codenamed 'Huts') I'll be sure to make available >>for public scrutiny. >> >>Don't hold your breath though, life is pretty much upside down at the >>moment (financially, emotionally, physically, mentally) and >I'm really >>not sure when and if I'll get to work on it again. If I >decide I can't >>work on it I'll have no qualms about giving it away for >someone else to >>work on. >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Kevin A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: 03 October 2002 20:46 >>>To: Struts Users Mailing List >>>Subject: RE: [OT] Should I use a persistence layer? >>> >>> >>>I've been playing around with Hibernate >>>(http://hibernate.sourceforge.net) on personal project and >it seems to >>>be pretty easy to work with and has good performance. >>> >>>--Kevin >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Chen, Dean (Zhun) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:25 PM >>>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' >>>Subject: RE: Should I use a persistence layer? >>> >>> >>>Thanks for this, what good persistence layers are there? Is there >>>something that works with struts and is simple? >>> >>>Dean Chen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Joe Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:41 PM >>>To: Struts Users Mailing List >>>Subject: RE: Should I use a persistence layer? >>> >>> >>>Yes. The standard approach is to only keep in memory >results that are >>>currently on the page. Have a persistence layer (either EJB or O/R >>>mapping tool, or a combination of the two) "page" the >results for you. >>>i.e., you give it search criteria, sort criteria, a begin index, and >>>an end index, and it gives you back the results. This solves two >>>problems: The one you are encountering with bad results with two >>>different windows, and the memory problems associated with >very large >>>result sets. >>> >>>There are examples of this sort of implementation out there; sorry I >>>can't provide links. :( >>> >>>peace, >>>Joe >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Chen, Dean (Zhun) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:13 AM >>>>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' >>>>Subject: Should I use a persistence layer? >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>For an web application, is there a way for a user to >>>> >>>> >>>paginate through >>> >>> >>>>(similar to google) a lot of data across multiple browser windows. >>>> >>>>The usual way of paginating with session scope works fine. However, >>>>if a user has 2 windows open on the same application. When he/she >>>>queries on one, >>>>then queries on another, and then comes back to the first >>>>window and click >>>>"Next", he/she will get bad results. >>>> >>>>Does this lead to EJB or any other persistence layers? >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>>Dean Chen >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For >>>additional commands, >>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For >>>additional commands, >>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For >>>additional commands, >>>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>>--- >>>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>>Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>--- >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002 >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> >> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For >additional commands, >e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ><mailto:struts-user->[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For >additional commands, >e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002 > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 30/09/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
