Frederic Barozzi wrote: >You're rigth. >but , in an other hand all my software users want: >- a garantee of standar. >- a complete source code. >- and all reasons that explain lib uses and architecture choices. > >For example, it was difficult to explain the "Struts framwork" choice. Why >don't you use standar java classes, they said ! > Because if I did that it would take longer to build your application - and it would cost more.
... that's what I'd say :-) >If they have money and give >time ...why not ? > Quality? There's a reason. There are so many folks that have this stuff in (heavy!) production environments. That means bugs get found - and fixed! Are they really not concerned about time? ... they must have more dollars than cents (read: sense). >So, my question is an architecture one: "the best way to mix xml ans jsp (if >it exists!)" > >Tanks > I'm sorry - I can't give you advice on your problem :-( but there are others around that probably can. I do understand your perdicament - sounds like someone with a bad case of NIH syndrome (Not Invented Here). How many times do you have to reinvent the wheel before you figure out that - as long as it's nicely rounded ... and rolls smoothly - there's no need to do it again! Ok - that might not be the best way to explain it to them, but I think you get my point ... -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
