Andrew Hill wrote: ><solution> >Close your script tag by putting a </script> after it. ></solution> ><explanation> >IE thinks the whole page after the script opening is part of your script. >Interesting to see a situation where Mozilla does better reading dodgy html >than IE! >If you feed Mozilla the page (as you pasted in your message below) it will >automatically assume the </script> tag for you - which you can verify by >looking at the page source through mozilla. IE doesnt make this assumption >for you. ></explanation> > The "big boys" could learn a *lot* from Mozilla, IMNSHO.
><btw> >Ive also noticed IE doesnt understand the xhtml / inside same tag closure - ><script src="dsdsd.js"/> either - you have to explicitly use a seperate ></script> rather than the more concise xml format. :-( >(hehe - spare a thought for me - I use DOM manipulation with xerces instead >of JSP to render my xhtml. Xerces serialises out script tags with a <sdsds/> >style if they have no body content so all my script tags have to explicitly >put an empty comment inside - <script src="ssdsdafads"><!----></script> so >xerces will keep it as a seperate start and end tag and IE will be happy!) ></btw> ><btw> >Whats with the totally inconsistent use of ' and "? >Your raw html is $#$ing ugly dude! (I suppose it looks ok in the jsp source >though?) >(Could be worse though. Have you seen what FrontPage output looks like! >rofl) ></btw> > -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
