Thanks for the prompt info!...

Unfortunately I don't have a lot of time to sift through the
ActionServlet's code :P
As far as I've gone through StrutsTestCase doesn't seem to bother
appending the module prefix to the expected path, but I might be wrong,
not having an in dept knowledge of Struts internals...

As anyone else experienced these problems? Are there any known
solutions? Any workarounds? I'm kind of in a hurry... If I can't get
StrutsTestCase to work with Struts modules I'll be forced to revert to a
single default module.

TIA,
Jorge


 
________________________________________________________________________
   inesc-id   Jorge Martins              | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lisboa        Software Engineering Group |
http://www.esw.inesc-id.pt/~jorge



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Kevin.Bedell@;sunlife.com] 
Sent: sexta-feira, 15 de Novembro de 2002 14:07
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 and StrutsTestCase





While I am do not know the  exact problem, I have seen similar problems
recently.

They generally have been related to recent changes in the core Struts
ActionServlet for detection and tracking of "modules".

It may be that recent changes in how Struts detects and tracks modules
have not been reflected in the most recent StrutsTestCase.

To resolve this I would recommend reviewing the current source for
servletunit.struts.Common.verifyForwardPath.java  and compare it's
evaluation of the forward path to how the ActionServlet currently tracks
it.

Sorry to not have more -

Kevin

http://www.strutskickstart.com






"Jorge Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/15/2002 07:46:12 AM

Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To:    "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:     (bcc: Kevin Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife)
Subject:    RE: Struts 1.1 and StrutsTestCase


Just tested with the nightly build of struts (20021114) and the CVS HEAD
version of StrutsTestCase...

Got the behaviour I had experienced with Struts 1.1-b2 (but the dynamic
validators are now working!)

In the test method at some point I make a call to
'verifyForward("Sucesso")' which is mapped as follows:

<action ...>
  <forward name="Sucesso" path="/index.do"/>
</action>

This mapping is defined within a sub-application named 'docente', so it
seems Struts is handling well the request, but StrutsTestCase isn't
dealing with the sub-application prefix...

An excerpt from the test's result is below:

Testcase: testSuccessfulCriarSitio took 2,907 sec
 FAILED
was expecting '/index.do' but received '/docente/index.do'
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: was expecting '/index.do' but
received '/docente/index.do'  at
servletunit.struts.Common.verifyForwardPath(Common.java:171)
 at
servletunit.struts.MockStrutsTestCase.verifyForward(MockStrutsTestCase.j
ava:465)
...

If anyone can shed some light over this issue...

Thanks,
 Jorge


________________________________________________________________________
   inesc-id   Jorge Martins              | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lisboa        Software Engineering Group |
http://www.esw.inesc-id.pt/~jorge



-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net]
Sent: sexta-feira, 15 de Novembro de 2002 1:38
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 and StrutsTestCase


Jorge Martins wrote:

>Hi,
>I'm using a nightly build of struts (20021101) and can't get the 
>StrutsTestCase unit testing framework to work for sub-applications...
>
I think this has been fixed in more recent nightly builds - try a more
recent one, please.

>I've tried using struts 1.1-b2 and the the tests work partially 
>(forwards verification doesn't deal with forwards defined within an 
>action in a sub-application), but the Struts Dynamic Validator doesn't 
>seem to work properly...
>
>Does anyone have these problems? Is there any way of using Dynamic 
>Validators in struts 1.1-b2?
>
It's conceivable that the problems you are experiencing are causing this

other aberrant behavior.  Try a more recent nightly and report back,
please.

>Thanks in advance,
>    Jorge
>

--
Eddie Bush



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <
mailto:struts-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>







------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt
from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender and erase this e-mail
message immediately.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:struts-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to