I am investigating quite a few object mapping frameworks and JDO seems to be my only choice to stick with. Is it a good assumption since it is a standard framework?
-Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brandon Goodin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:30 AM Subject: RE: Struts and OJB > I have used OJB in two project. Be sure you know the performance impact. It > is a great tool. But, it will take you a while to learn how to use it > "effectively". The caching is all or none (you can spin your own) and the > fine grained control that you have over object materialization is something > you need to understand. I would say for you to make sure you understand how > to use the Proxy. If you don't you will be creating massive amounts of > objects and slow your performance drastically. IMHO, I don't think that OJB > is the answer for all projects. The reduction that you find in your own code > as compared to the time it takes to become completely familiar with an > evolving code base is pretty dramatic. Like mentioned earlier. I think that > after a 1.0 final version is released then the community will have more time > to update the docs and write some books. When that happens I am going to > take another look at it. Until then... I just can't keep up and I don't > think that it is performant for the "ignorant" (i.e. me :-)) All I can say > is if you are going to learn OJB right then spend some time scouring the > scads of source and see what is truly going on. "Use the source Luke!" :-) > Personally, I just don't have the time for that and I am more productive > using a tweak of the Sun recommended DAO Pattern. > > Brandon Goodin > Phase Web and Multimedia > P (406) 862-2245 > F (406) 862-0354 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.phase.ws > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Wickard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:00 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Struts and OJB > > > James Mitchell wrote: > > >Yes, I agree (almost).....you can (so I've heard) change it so that > >those required internal tables are in another database, but for now I > >don't really mind. > > > > > > > Yeah, I just fixed the problem by using a different o/r mapping tool. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
