What kind of smoke break are you taking? > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Rendering alternate rows of a table in Struts > > > Personally I prefer the new Java Magic library. You just > sprinkle the magic dust on your keyboard and say the magic > words and BAM you got table rows with alternating colors. > This way I don't have to argue with my fellow developers over > scriplets vs. custom tags. We just all rely on Java Magic and > go take smoke breaks. > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/03 01:35PM >>> > Oh, and cutting and pasting tags is better? With scriptlets, > you need to > know one thing: Java. With taglibs you must expand and > juggle knowledge by > an order of magnitude. Anybody who knows Java can understand > a scriptlet; > the converse cannot be said of taglibs. > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Durham David Cntr 805CSS/SCBE > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:25 PM > > Taglibs aren't just useful to people working with HTML, they > are a great way > to reuse logic in JSP's. Cutting and pasting scriplets IMO is not. > > -Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:07 PM > > > > Well, let's be honest, dude. The great idea behind taglibs > > in the first > > place was to allow non-developers such as HTMLers and graphic > > artists to be > > able to manipulate content without understanding a > > programming language and > > keep real programmers (yes, I have a definition, if you are > > interested) from > > having to maintain the presentation layer. Now, from that > > perspective, look > > and my example and look at yours. Which is going to be clearer to a > > non-programmer? > > > > Otherwise, look how complex using a taglib is to integrate into an > > application, to say nothing of what it takes to develop a custom > > taglib (I've done it). I may sound like a heretic, but in my mind, > > SIMPLE scriptlets are better than a tag to do the same thing - from > > development, > > integration, and maintenance perspectives. > > > > Mark (they don't call me Chief Eating Crow for nothing) Galbreath > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rob Kischuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:13 AM > > > > > That's all well and good but what happens when the author > no longer > > supports > > > it, technology moves on, and somebody behind you has got to > > maintain > > > it? Doing it with scriptlets is as easy as > > > > > > <% int count = 0 %> > > > <logic:iterate . . .> > > > <% if( count % 2 == 0 ) { %> > > > <tr bgcolor="coral"> > > > <td></td> > > > <% } else { %> > > > <tr bgcolor="fuscia"> > > > <td></td> > > > <% } %> > > > </tr> > > > <% count++ %> > > > </logic:iterate> > > > > > > What could be simpler and clearer? This methodology is > > much easier to > > > maintain than some esoteric third-party tags. > > > > <c:forEach var="currItem" items="${myCollection}" varStatus="info"> > > <c:if test="${info.count % 2 == 0}"> > > <tr bgcolor="coral"> > > </c:if> > > <c:if test="${info.count % 2 == 1}"> > > <tr bgcolor="fuschia"> > > </c:if> > > <td>blah blah</td> > > </tr> > > </c:forEach> > > > > Simple. Clear. Standard. The logic is plain, JSTL isn't > > going to have the > > maintenance issues you mention, and there's no nasty > > scriptlet delimiters > > muddling the mix. > > > > -Rob > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
