thanks David, this makes the lack of setRedirect() easy to fix > -----Original Message----- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3? > > > You can create and return new ActionForwards and return them > from Actions. > > David > > > > >From: "Joe Barefoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Struts user (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3? > >Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:37:44 -0800 > > > >Hi all, > > > >So I see that the call to setRedirect() in the new > ActionForward class will > >cause an exception if called at runtime (after the configuration is > >frozen). I wasn't expecting this, as I previously thought > that only the > >ActionMapping(s) config was frozen. We can obviously work > around this, > >but...really need to add a note to the javadocs (or something). > > > >There are no problems with creating a new ActionForward and > returning it > >from an Action, right? If so, when we need to change the > redirect flag, we > >can just make a "copy" of the current ActionForward, setting > redirect to > >the value we desire, and return it, yes? > > > > > >thanks, > >Joe > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
