I was referring to storing the http_referrer and then popping back there.
And obviously this breaks the action forwarding cycle. (And let's not even
talk about users jumping directly to one of my sequence pages from the
outside world. We know THAT never happens. :-)

But you're suggesting storing the action name rather than the URL. I hadn't
considered this. (I'm not sure how to get that information, but I'm sure it
is addressed to death in previous threads, or maybe even in the
documentation. :-)

Thanks, I think that solves my immediate problem. But it sure would be nice
if struts had a built-in mechanism for supporting these kinds of sequences.

Jefficus

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Q] Return-to-page - is there a slick solution?


> >I could easily track that info in the first action step, put it into the
> >session scope and then pop back there at the end. But that seems to
> >circumvent the entire struts action forwarding mechanism.
>
> Not if you store the action name in the session in the first step and have
> the last step call mapping.findForward(storedName);
>
> David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to