some implemenations of collections are faster than others. Vectors are thought to be the slowest.
you can run a simple test to see guage the impact of using one -vs- the other in your application. "Michael Ruppin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Without checking the archives for specific references, > I'm still sure I've read on multiple occasions, "Don't > use Vectors, use ArrayLists". I was under the > impression that this was because Vectors are not > synchronized. After refactoring, today, I read here > that ArrayLists are not synchronized: > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/api/java/util/ArrayList.html > > Time to refactor again? I need to be using one of the > static Collections.synchronized* methods, right? > Beyond using Objects that are synchronized, what > difference does it make which implementation of > Collection I choose? > > m > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). > http://calendar.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
