Actualy, I just found out that this is not "illegal" and it will not crash
anything ( it will just look odd in the validation.xml file ):
<form name="incMortPayForm">
<field property="newAmount" depends
="xor,amountNoRequired,integer,required,blahblah">
........................
</field>
</form>
can be split into:
<form name="incMortPayForm">
<field property="newAmount" depends="xor">
........................
</field>
<field property="newAmount" depends="amountNoRequired">
........................
</field>
<field property="newAmount" depends="integer">
........................
</field>
<field property="newAmount" depends="required">
........................
</field>
<field property="newAmount" depends="blahblah">
........................
</field>
</form>
Thereby GURANTEEING the sequence of validation - we have very complex
validations, and they must be done in
a particular sequence...
Regards, a.m.
"Yansheng Lin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing
List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
25/07/2003 04:24 PM Subject: RE: validation
Please respond to "Struts sequence
Users Mailing List"
Ok, if you want to be 100% sure the sequence is right, add an alert()
statement
in each validate functions:).
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 25, 2003 2:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: validation sequence
This is my form and the generated Javascript, please note the position of
the * integer * validator. Most of the validators are custom, except the
* integer * validator, and for some reason, it puts it at the END of the
generated validator Javascript.
Thanks, a.m.
<form name="incMortPayForm">
<field property="mortNumber"
depends="reqXDefault,integer">
........................
</field>
<field property="newAmount"
depends="xor,amountNoRequired">
........................
</field>
<field property="pcntIncrease" depends
="xor,pcntAmount">
........................
</field>
<field property="coCardNumber"
depends="condRequired,condMask">
........................
</field>
<field property="coPassword" depends="condRequired">
........................
</field>
<field property="guarCardNumber"
depends="condRequired,condMask">
........................
</field>
<field property="guarPassword" depends
="condRequired">
........................
</field>
</form>
<script type="text/javascript" language="Javascript1.1">
<!-- Begin var bCancel = false; function
validateIncMortPayForm(form) { if (bCancel) return true;
else return validateReqXDefault(form) && validateXOR(form) &&
validateAmount(form) && validatePcntAmount(form) &&
validateCondRequired(form) && validateCondMask(form) &&
validateInteger(form); } "Yansheng Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25/07/2003 03:34 PM Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List"
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Subject: RE: validation sequence On client side, if your
javascript is something like: return validateA(form) &&
validateMask(form) && validateB(form) than the execution sequence will be
from left to right. -----Original Message----- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July
25, 2003 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: validation
sequence Hi there, I was wondering, does anyone know in which sequence this
kind of validation will happen - depends
="acustomvalidation,mask,bcustomvalidation" so, will it be alphabetic as
in: acustomvalidation,bcustomvalidation,mask or
acustomvalidation,mask,bcustomvalidation or random?? Thanks, Aleksandar.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
