Has this "easier to use" premiss been run past any folks with good markup skills, but aren't programmers as such? Seems to me the only folks who are saying this is "easier" lean more toward the programming end of the spectrum than formatting folks. Ummmmm the burden of using "expert groups".


On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 05:34 PM, David Graham wrote:



--- Marco Tedone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,

it's quite a long time that I am not monitoring the struts-user list any
more...Last time was about three months ago. One of my project's new
entry
asked me why don't we use JSTL and Struts-el instead of taglibs and
Struts
tags...Well, last time I posted on this list I asked Craig if the time
was
mature for JSTL and I've been suggested that it would be better to wait
as
JSTL were in their beta-release.


Two questions:

1) Is now the time to use JSTL? Could we continue to use Struts tags
without
for it loosing in performance?

Yes, JSTL is now finalized and you can/should use it in your apps. The
JSTL tags will perform much faster than Struts' tags because containers
can optimize the generated code for JSTL. You'll also gain improved
development performance as the JSTL tags are more powerful and easier to
use.



2) WHAT IS IT Strus-el?

Struts-EL is a Struts taglib that allows you to use powerful JSTL Expression Language (EL) statements for the attribute values.

David



Thank you for any reply,


Marco




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to