> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 10, 2003 9:42 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Struts Validator Javascript
>
>
> Sgarlata Matt wrote:
> > I like the concept of the validator, but personally I don't
> have a lot of
> > confidence in it.
>
> that's a bit harsh. I think as long as you know what it does and doesn't
> do, there's every reason to have confidence in it. It's an excellent
> package that will benefit even more when people use it and reports bugs
>   or vote for existing ones or even submit patches in bugzilla :O
>
> I sense an opportunity to share something I got from the Ant mailing
> list recently (struts gurus feel free to slap me down if the same sort
> of thing doesn't apply to struts) :
>

Can I also suggest:
  (0) make *sure* it's a bug before you post a bug report.

If you don't *know* that what you're experiencing is a *Struts* bug then the
correct place to explore the problem is on the struts-user list. If what
you're asking for is really an enhancement then mark it as such in Bugzilla.

>
> (1) open an enhancement request in bugzilla and attach your patch.  If
>      you just send it to the list it could get lost over time.
>
> (2) send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] explaining why you think the enhancement is
>      worth it.

Bugzilla reports get sent to the dev list so you don't need to duplicate
that. Committers are also pretty active on the user list ;-)

>
> (3) send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that the people who share your opinion
>      can go to the enhancement request and vote for it.
>
> (4) be persistent.  It is often the case that committers have a lot of
>      time for Ant development in one week and almost none in the next.
>      This could mean you'll need to redo (2).

I would replace (4) with be patient. If you've opened a Bugzilla report then
it *will* get reviewed. But time is limited and certain issues will be dealt
with more quickly. Straight-forward items and serious items tend to get
closed more quickly, with those falling into the not serious, but not
trival, taking a little longer.

Keep investigating the problem. If you can come up with new information or a
patch, then that will serve as a much more useful reminder than just
repeating yourself.

Steve

>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to