BaTien Duong wrote:
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
any advice in choosing tiles vs jetspeedy?
I suppose tiles integrates better, but at the other side jettyspeed follows the portlets specification. Any other comments?
It is still too early to tell. I believe in simplicity and the right design that up to now Struts-Tiles give us elegant controller-templating engine. Craig has stated his "ideal goal" for developing Struts to work with JSR-168. The challenge is to have something like tiles as a template engine according to JSR-168 specifications for Portal / Portlet container(s).
I think after the release of JSR-168 Reference Inplementation, many Struts developers (i know at least a number of Portals based on Struts-Tiles, all except basicPortal.com <FIX>, stating to support JSR-168) (i am one of them) will seriously put some time in this refactoring process.
Just FYI, this is the reason bP will bypass 168: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-user&m=105850057414235&w=2
bP action event context actually handles the potlet api and servlet api (as it was built to handle more the servlets... SOAP for example), but instead will focus on WS, SOA, XML-RPC and other things that address a heterogeneous environment, organizations that have C# and Java. If anyone wants to jump of the bridge... I will have even more clients. :-)
I plan to implent something better than dataGridGirl.com, Ex: http://www.tufat.com/datagrid/datagrid2.html
So we just have different goals. What is the url to the portal you are building, if it is avialable?
.V
BaTien DBGROUPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
