I hope this doesn't sound like a guide to egg sucking..
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 01:54 PM, Mark Lowe wrote:
Drilling to document object via the id is a bit restricting anyhow. Using the older way of using name (property) is more reliable, and supported by just about everything.
I've always restricted id for dhtml stuff, and always use name for form work. Hope this sounds like a guide to egg sucking.
Cheers Mark
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 01:44 PM, Slattery, Tim - BLS wrote:
Why is it that the html-el:hidden tag has no "styleId" attribute?
I'll go with the logical answer of:
It's a hidden form tag, so there is no point in having a visual style for a non-visible element.
Regards, David
"styleId" becomes the "id" attribute of the HTML tag. That is *not* a visual
style. It makes it possible to address the element and retrieve or assign a
value in Javascript. The regular <html:hidden...> tag has styleId, so why in
the world did the implementors drop it from the <html-el:hidden ...> tag?
-- Tim Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
