Okay, you missed the message I sent out a few days ago regarding this.
I've patched XDoclet to allow you to specify your DynaForm configs
as XDoclet tags. An example:
/**
@struts.dynaform name="testForm" type="org.example.form.BaseDynaForm"
*/
public class Test {
/**
* @struts.dynaform-field name="id" type="java.lang.Long" initial="0"
*/
// and so on.....
}
I'm thinking about having it detect the 'type' attribute, but I haven't had
time yet. Here's the original post:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=89738
If you'd like to download it, you can get it here:
http://www.systemmobile.com/code/xdoclet-apache-module-sm-1_2b4.zip
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:54:01PM -0400, Chen, Gin wrote:
> For starters:
>
> If you have a dynaform defined like so:
>
> <form-bean name="searchForm" type="com.foo.ui.form.SearchForm">
> <form-property name="userName" type="java.lang.String"/>
> </form-bean>
>
> You have to define the above in the merge file and then define the java
> supporting class with no Xdoclets tag.
> I would much perfer to be able to do:
>
> /**
> * @struts.form name="searchForm"
> * @struts.property name="userName" type="java.lang.String"
> */
> In my java class and have it auto generate the above merge xml.
>
> The whole tiles support in Xdoclet could be more robust as well.
> -Tim
>
--
Nick Heudecker
SystemMobile, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.systemmobile.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
