It seems to me that a tiles controller can play the role of view helper.  It
is definitely more convenient that writing custom tags.  :-)


-- 
Sean Dockery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Certified Java Web Component Developer
Certified Delphi Programmer
SBD Consultants
http://www.sbdconsultants.com


"Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The current trend is to define two sets of Actions. One set represents
> the business actions, the client stories. This Action interacts with the
> business layer and, based on what happens, selects the next View. Back
> in the Struts 0.5 days, the ActionForward would often points to a server
> page, so the Action would, essentially, forward directly to a JSP.
>
> Most of us now find it convenient to create a second set of "View"
> Actions. These Actions work as "page controllers". Instead of forwarding
> to the JSP, we forward to these Actions instead. These Actions can then
> prepare the request with whatever "chrome" the page may need.
>
> It's a good practice to define an ActionMapping for every presentation
> page in the application, whether it's a server page or HTML, local or
> remote, even if it just forwards out to a page. If you need to add an
> Action class later, or switch in a server page for a static page, you
> can do that without changing anything else.
>
> In Strut 1.1, I find it useful to separate the business Actions and the
> view Actions into separate configuration files, and may give the View
> Actions their own virtual path. So there might be a /SelectPermitAction
> and a /view/SelectPermitAction.
>
> There is talk of adding a specific extension point for a "view Action"
> as part of the ActionForward construct, but AFAIK, no one's rolled up
> their sleeves and given it a try. This would save a trip through the
> container, and simplify cases where you want to redirect to another
> business Action.
>
> HTH, Ted.
>
> Keith Pemberton wrote:
> > Experts,
> >
> >     I'm struggling with using the View Helper pattern.  In my logical
way of
> > thinking, when a request to any jsp page is made, then the request goes
to
> > the ActionServlet.  The ActionServlet then looks up the appropriate view
> > helper initiallizes it with any parameters that were passed in through
the
> > request.  The ActionServlet then requests that the view helper put the
> > required java bean object in the request scope and then the servlet
forwards
> > to the page that was requested.  This doesn't seem to be the case,
though,
> > with how struts works.  Please correct me if I am wrong, but every link
in
> > my jsp pages where the page that I am requesting has content that comes
from
> > a java bean (form bean) must be linked to some action component.  So,
just
> > say that I have an index page where I am displaying only five items at a
> > time out of database that are ranked based on their index number in the
> > database.  To get the next five entries from the database I would have
to
> > use the struts tags and put an html:link element in the page that
pointed to
> > some action class.  I, guess, am just looking for an assurance that I am
> > implementing the view helper pattern the correct way according to
struts.
> > Any help you can provide would be much appreciated!
> >
> > Keith Pemberton
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Ted Husted,
>    Junit in Action  - <http://www.manning.com/massol/>,
>    Struts in Action - <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>,
>    JSP Site Design  - <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1861005512>.
>
> "Get Ready, We're Moving Out!!" - <http://www.clark04.com>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to