Hookom, Jacob wrote:
Anyone who's done major business application development knows that academic arguments on programming 'style' get thrown right out the window in favor of efficient progress ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Trieu, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:38 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?
I don't want to offense any one, and all though HashMap or DynaWhatever are convenience, but isn't it anti OO? Meaning there are no type checking, and you are just passing a bag of chunk around?
Danny Trieu Internet Business Group Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand." - Frank Herbert (1920-1986) "The essence of knowledge is, having it, to apply it; not having it, to confess your ignorance." - Confucius (551-479 BC)
-----Original Message-----
From: Navjot Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:43 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?
I can't say there will be any move or not.
But MAP backed ActionForms are alreadt there, If you are not interested in using the actionforms and be contended with just hashmaps. Mostly, not always, I treat ActionForm as HashMap but with getter setter already classcasted and defined for properties. not more than that.
-----Original Message----- From: Antony Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:40 PM To: struts Subject: When HashMap will replace ActionForm ?
Hi, Is there any move to support HashMap in place of ActionForm ?. I dont want to start any argument. I have read a lot on ActionForm in this archive.
rgds
Antony Paul.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
