You have been subscribed to a public bug by Eric Desrochers (slashd): [Impact]
[Test Case] Scenario #1 * Deploy a machine (Xenial) with lxd installed as a DEB package * Install sosreport * sudo sosreport -o lxd or/and sudo sosreport -a * Extract the archive in /tmp and go in path_to_sosreport/sos_commands/lxd The data collection should be the one in the else statement of the plugin. Scenario #2 * Deploy a machine (Bionic and late) with lxd installed as a SNAP. * Install sosreport * sudo sosreport -o lxd or/and sudo sosreport -a * Extract the archive in /tmp and go in path_to_sosreport/sos_commands/lxd The data collection should be the one in the if statement of the plugin, only executing "lxd.buginfo" command only available in SNAP. Scenario #3: A quick script to run on a node to verify multiple different options (as a sanity check): https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sosreport/sos/master/tests/simple.sh sudo bash simple.sh /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/sosreport simple.sh is a quick port of the travis tests to bash, requires root. There is some work to incorporate this exact script into the sosreport package for autopkg testing, but meanwhile it can be run manually for verifications. [Regression] "lxd.buginfo" has the advantage of not needing updates whenever lxd upstream add a new feature or find something new that’s worth capturing since LXD is now only offered as a SNAP nowadays. The plugin will remain backward compatible with DEB and SNAP, until there is no supported lxd DEB package available. If a problem occurs it will only impact the lxd plugin, not the other plugins nor core functionnalities. If for some reasons a command can be executed (not found in versions installed or else). sosreport is fault tolerant, and will continue/skip the command that doesn't exist, fails, ... FWIW, the commit has been +1 by lxd upstream himself stgraber: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/1982/ [Others] upstream patch - https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/1982/commits/bdc5ffdf5b8376ab2014ec8fbd9a878cc9d0d264 LXD upstream reference: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/what-lxd-information-should-be-collected-by-sosreport ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) Status: In Progress ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) Status: In Progress ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) Status: In Progress ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) Status: In Progress ** Tags: sts -- SRU: [lxd] Drop db collection and introduce lxd.buginfo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
