Hey Matthew, I've taken a look at this, and overall your patches look good. I've added an author attribution for Didier Roche to d/changelog as he's the original author of the patch, but kept your changes as-is otherwise. I'd like to clear out a few points on the "0.11.0 being backported" situation, just so we don't risk trampling over a future upload for adsys:
- do you know who's doing the 0.11 backport to F/J/K? is this being coordinated with SEG/you? - is it going to land as a regular package in -updates, or is it going to be available through -backports? - is there any timeframe on when 0.11.0 would be made available? (i.e. would waiting for that release with a hotfix be an appropriate alternative in this case, or not because AWS is being AWS) If those aren't an issue, I have the package sources ready to go and will upload them tomorrow. Thanks again for the help! Cheers, Heitor On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:16 AM Matthew Ruffell < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Can you please review and sponsor adsys in LP #2020834? > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2020834 > > The package unfortunately uses d/source/format of "3.0 (native)" over > "3.0 (quilt)", so the debdiffs are created in native form not using > quilt. > > If this is incorrect, let me know, I have properly dep3 tagged > patches, but just need to know how to apply them since I can't use > quilt. > > There is 0.11.0 being backported to F/J/K, but AWS are in a real hurry > to get this fixed, so here we are. > > Thanks, > Matthew > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
