The ECL devs confirm that the only thing holding compatability back is thing 
that need to be implemented in wrappers.lisp
Considering that we currently have to chooe between 
fast-and-threaded(sbcl(sbcl/slime/stump broken on Sid atm)),or small(clisp) and 
ECL would bring us the best of both worls(in theory) I think it's very much 
worth it to do that.
Fuck, packagers could make a stumpwm-ecl binary, compiled with gcc.(need to 
research if the binaries strip symbols)

__  TheGZeus: Proof of Ferocious Will  __


_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel

Reply via email to