Shawn Betts <sabe...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> And THAT is why osicat exists. :) >> >> http://common-lisp.net/project/osicat/ > > Well shit we could just rip the code straight out of the > with-directory-iterator example! It sucks to add another dependency > but that looks like exactly what we need.
Actually, it's what CL-FAD exists for. OSICAT just surpasses the implementation and goes straight to the OS, while CL-FAD is a portability wrapper around DIRECTORY. You could probably just rip CL-FAD:LIST-DIRECTORY. -T. _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
