Johnny <yggdra...@gmx.co.uk> writes: >> >> Hi Johnny, >> >> It works for me, with the same snippet as yours, which version of stumpwm >> do you use? I use git and it's working here. >> >>> > Hi Wojciech, > > I am using 0.9.7-52, also from git, compiled with sbcl. I cloned git > into my ~/source directory, compiled stumpm and moved the executable to > /usr/local/bin. Does stumpwm require also the source lisp files in the > path maybe, and is there a smart location if so (e.g. /usr/local/lib?)?
There shouldn't be any kind of smart location involved I think. These symbols should be included in the loaded image. It looks like a mismatched version of stumpwm if you do C-t : version is it saying the version you are expecting? You clearly have in-package stumpwm statement, so it should pick it up. Mine is git build 40, and it's working. I can't think about something different. You should always be able to configure stumpwm with `--prefix' command line option, and then just do `make install'. I just use $HOME. I hope it helps. > > Thanks, Cheers; Wojciech _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
