I would also like to chime in with support for a separate wiki
documenting add-ons. I ended up re-implementing functionality in some of
them before realizing a solution existed. There is also very little
*visible* documentation of whats in contrib, unless you see it
referenced in a stumpwmrc, or in IRC.
Something like emacsWiki would be an absolute boon to StumpWM in my
opinion.
Dave
Lucas Pandolfo <lucashpando...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 19 November 2011 14:33, Ben Spencer <dangerous....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> What if instead we had a database of stumpwm add-ons that were
> hosted
> elsewhere? This could be something as simple as a wiki page or a
> full-blown system with reviews, comments etc if anybody cared to
> make
> it.
>
> The authors of the add-ons could maintain their software in their
> own
> repos (including non-git repos if they have some strange aversion
> to
> git), and users could keep it up to date from there. The packages
> could use asdf to make it convenient to load them from stumpwmrc.
>
>
>
> I like the idea.
> Something like the scripts section in the sawfish wiki
> (http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Scripts).
> Or maybe something like box-look.org
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
