Mostafa Razavi <hom.sepa...@gmail.com> writes: > It isn't in that list. All the fonts in the Font Path are in > /usr/share/fonts/X11/ while the ttf fonts are in > /usr/share/fonts/truetype. I tried adding that to the list with "xset > fp+" but I got a "bad font path element" error. I also tried googling > to learn a bit more about fonts in X, but damn, anything I find is at > least a few years old (references to the late xfree86 are > abundant). Seems like the last time people had font problems was > several years ago! > > Question is, if the ttf fonts are not in the font path, how come emacs > can use them?
emacs uses fontconfig and xft nowadays. I don't know if stumpwm uses xft, but "grep -iR xft *" and "grep -iR fontc *" in the stumpwm sources didn't get a result, so I assume it doesn't. As "grep -iR xft *" in the sources for the debian package of cl-clx-sbcl didn't turn up anything, I doubt that clx provides support for xft. And stumpwm uses clx to communicate with the X server, so no xft in stumpwm too, I assume. Sorry to disappoint you, Eric > Thanks, > Mostafa _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel