On Sat, Sep 15 2012, Michael Raskin wrote:

> <CAOFjF6eihW_8Yy-tyTZ+T=w1tyczon4scg2g81gfy-n1kta...@mail.gmail.com>
> <87r4q4ui6o....@ericabrahamsen.net>
> <caofjf6d8dd6tk-8dqjgnrpwcxtorv3euddnc3a4phxcrdyn...@mail.gmail.com>)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>>> frames are stored in a tree so that destroying frames removes the
>>> split the way it was created. group-frames collapses that tree into a
>>> list.
>>
>>Okay, just for curiosity's sake: is the tree made use of in any
>>significant way? I see that the `sibling' command will select a
>>different frame based on the tree structure, but beyond that I don't see
>>the tree making much of an appearance. Is that right?
>
> Well, resizing is based on the tree structure, and frame removal uses
> the tree to decide which frame should get the extra space

Interesting -- thanks!


_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel

Reply via email to