On Sat, Sep 15 2012, Michael Raskin wrote: > <CAOFjF6eihW_8Yy-tyTZ+T=w1tyczon4scg2g81gfy-n1kta...@mail.gmail.com> > <87r4q4ui6o....@ericabrahamsen.net> > <caofjf6d8dd6tk-8dqjgnrpwcxtorv3euddnc3a4phxcrdyn...@mail.gmail.com>) > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > >>> frames are stored in a tree so that destroying frames removes the >>> split the way it was created. group-frames collapses that tree into a >>> list. >> >>Okay, just for curiosity's sake: is the tree made use of in any >>significant way? I see that the `sibling' command will select a >>different frame based on the tree structure, but beyond that I don't see >>the tree making much of an appearance. Is that right? > > Well, resizing is based on the tree structure, and frame removal uses > the tree to decide which frame should get the extra space
Interesting -- thanks! _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel