On 10/24/12 03:55, z_axis wrote: > Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:19:38 +0800，Dirk Sondermann: >> On 10/23/12 09:04, z_axis wrote: >>> It seems there is nobody to run stumpwm using ECL successfully. >>> So i suggest removing ECL relatives from stumpwm sources in order >>> not to mislead the users. >> >> About a week ago, as an answer to your message of October 11, I posted >> a short description of how a working stumpwm image can be built using >> ECL 12.7.1. I have been using this image for several days now without >> any issues, so I dare to say there is no serious problem with stumpwm >> and ECL. > > I have seen your reply. But A ECL without thread is not a good choice. > Since i want to start swank server in stumpwm.
You didn't mention that in your first post. Not being able to use swank is a pity, but IMHO it doesn't justify to remove the ECL support in the stumpwm sources. -- Dirk _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
